Smith And Nephew Hip Replacement Lawsuit

Plaintiffs in this litigation allege they were injured after receiving a birmingham hip resurfacing bhr device or a total hip arthroplasty tha utilizing birmingham hip components.

Smith and nephew hip replacement lawsuit.

The birmingham hip resurfacing or bhr system and r3 acetabular hip system metal liners are part of a mass litigation. In the resurfacing procedure the hip ball bone is shaped and. Smith nephew hip recall. Depuy a division of johnson johnson smith nephew stryker zimmer biomet and others have been named in these cases.

These metallic implants require far more corrective surgeries than other implants. Current hip replacement lawsuits. The manufacturer issued a voluntary recall in june of 2018 but phased this model out of production five years ago. Smith nephew hip lawsuits are mass tort claims against smith nephew for the defective design of their metal implants used in hip replacement surgeries including their birmingham hip resurfacing system.

The smith nephew birmingham hip litigation is in full swing. Your first generation smith nephew journey bi cruciate stabilized bcs knee replacement system journey i bcs knee system may be defective. People have filed smith nephew hip replacement lawsuits because the manufacturer s metal on metal devices led to metallosis and other serious complications. As a result of smith nephew manufacturer of bhr failing to design a sufficiently safe and effective hip implant you or a loved one may have suffered negative health consequences needed revision surgeries or therapy experienced emotional pain incurred lost wages due to time off work and other significant related expenses.

Worse metal fragments can grind off the implants and cause severe complications including metal poisoning. The company has recalled thousands of the devices. Their hip replacement devices have mostly been very successful but there are a number of products that have led to revision surgeries. Smith nephew hip lawsuits are still in the early stages but at least four models have been named in lawsuits.

Many manufacturers of hip replacement devices have experienced problems and smith. Preemptive challenge survives smith nephew hip implant lawsuit claim february 2016 a federal judge in the u s. Smith nephew recalled 4 000 r3 acetabular hip systems in 2012 and 2 000 modular smf and modular redapt revision femoral hip systems in 2016 over issues that could result in more lawsuits. Smith nephew birmingham hip.

District court for the southern district of west virginia case number 2 14 cv 30279 has determined that the claims a plaintiff makes in her hip replacement injury lawsuit are not preempted by federal statute. As much promise as hip replacement surgery offers some people it causes others a great deal of pain and suffering.